Case Study Analysis
UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX
Prof. MARY BENTLEY
In the case of Carl Robins is not doing his job correctly or the applicants are screwing him over by not completing the applications or not giving the right documentation. It’s possible that his operations supervisor Monica is testing his fate to perform by multi-tasking to see if he can get it done in a timely manner. Carl’s poor planning and lack of initiative was the cause of his failure. Even though he failed to take initiative his should have looked at the applicant’s work and to make sure he double check everything for the 15 new applicants needed to start the recruitment training for the job. He should of planned and organize an schedule the activities that must take place prior to a trainees’ employment, for example while I was on the job we put up a tent to get it ready for the Field Training exercise so 19 sleeping beds were supposed to be inside the tent when one of the soldiers told me there was 19 sleeping beds so I go and tell my superiors that 19 sleeping beds were in the tent little that I knew 17 sleeping beds but it was my fault that I did not double check so my superiors chewed me out.
Carl was responsible for completing multiple of tasks prior to the new trainees starting work in July and was reminded of multiple tasks but could not perform as he should have but failed to do. Everybody cannot multi-task at the time Carl Robins is brand new but could have been under pressure or stress, personnel issues away from the job can cause a reason to fail.
The orientation, drug tests, and physicals were to be scheduled and completed, and the manuals, training schedules, and...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document