Case Study Evaluation Protocol and Procedures
Evaluation of the overall quality of each case study will be made on the following criteria:
CASE STUDY PARTS
Summary paragraph introducing the project, building, hypothesis, highlights of findings.
concise brief of the parts to the case study.
Description of building, background information, designer’s intent, observations, and how team decided on topic. selection of an interesting or challenging building;
relevant issues to current building performance topics that address energy-use and conservation and/or occupant well-being and associated topics covered during the Fall term.
Hypothesis / Inquiry Questions
A question converted to a statement that can be tested, deals with one relevant topic, and has only one clause. suitability in scope and context to the case study building; testable and well-framed statement linking design intent to performance topic. Significance in going beyond the mundane.
Methods / Equipment
Step-by-step procedure that explains how, who, what, where and details of the collection of information. innovative utilization of field methods which are well-matched to the hypothes(es) and based upon direct experience with the selected building; appropriate approach and use of equipment for this case study.
Data / Analysis
Collection of data and explanation and interpretation of the results.
effective communication and analysis of results in response to the research questions; this may include creative or unique ways of representing data; Conclusions / Design Lessons Learned
Concise statements of key findings and what was learned.
understanding of the complexities and variables of the project. appropriateness of concluding statements
suggestions for studies to build upon this case study.
ease and logic of navigation;
readability and clarity;
creativity in using the web to enhance the representation of data....
Please join StudyMode to read the full document