Organizational Behavioral Study for Adobe Systems Incorporated University of Phoenix School of Advanced Studies
Adobe Systems Incorporated is committed to innovation. In 1982, Chuck Geschke and John Warnock founded Adobe when they set out to solve the problem of getting text and images on a computer screen. In 1983 they launched Adobe Post Script and were embraced as industry visionaries and leaders. Adobe’s Portable Document Format or PDF provided solutions for businesses and allowed enterprises to use this format in a secure manner. Adobe Systems is the leading provider of graphic design, publishing, and imaging software for Web and print production. The research for this paper shows Adobe Systems Incorporated commitment to its workforce and how this commitment leads to increased organizational performance.
Adobe Systems Incorporated
Adobe Systems Incorporated is committed to leveraging the diversity of its workforce through a comprehensive set of programs designed to encourage a wide variety of ideas, backgrounds, and perspectives. This translates into a key competitive advantage and increased organizational performance (Adobe, n.d.). Background
Adobe Systems Incorporated (ASI) is an American global prominent software provider. The company was founded in December 1982 and went public in1986. The company has its headquarters in San Jose, California, United States of America (USA). The company licenses its technology to hardware manufacturers, software developers and service providers. Adobe has operations in the Americas, Europe, Middle East and Africa, and Asia which makes it geographically diversified revenue base company. In FY2009, 46.9% of the company’s revenues came of its software and related solutions in the Americas, 31.5% from Europe Middle East Africa, and 21.5% from Asia Pacific (Thompson, 2009).
The revenue result shows diversity in the company’s geographical revenue spread. The diversification of the revenue reduces its risk associated with adverse economic, political instability in the markets, and enhances its financial position. As a technology company Adobe operates in a rapid changing industry. Throughout Adobe’s history, the company had survived shifts in the industry from print to web publishing, electronic documents, and interactive experiences (Thompson, 2009). The changing technology trend- new products coming out rapidly- creates challenges for customers in terms of choice, and for businesses in terms of designing appropriate organizational structures to deal with customers demand and changing environment. Scott stated that, “While many specific measures of technology have been proposed, it appears that the most important dimensions to represent in relating technology to structure are complexity, uncertainty, and interdependence” (261). Despite operating in a complex, uncertain and interdependence among parts of the organization, Adobe is financially sound relative to Competitors. The company in 2009 delivered annual net income of $386.5 million (Thompson, 2009).
Purpose of the Study
In 1995 Fortune magazine ranked Adobe as an outstanding place to work (Adobe Systems Incorporated, 2010). The company was rated fifth in 2003, sixth in 2004 and 31 in 2007 as the best U.S. Company to work for. According to Scott, “contingency theorists have argued that some types of structures were better suited than others to certain tasks or environments (Scott, 2003, Chapter para.1). The purpose of this study is to test if diversification of operations and workforce (organizational design) can increase performance despite global economic down- turn and its impacts on the technology industry and organizations. Significance of the Study
Translation of the significance of the study is a vital segment of this paper. The ability to describe the benefits of this study will give Adobe information to assist in the continuation of...
References: Adobe. (n.d.). Commitment to employees. Retrieved October 15, 2010 from http://www.adobe.com/corporateresponsibility/commitment.htm
Adobe Systems Incorporated. (2010). Wikipedia. Retrieved October 15, 2010 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adobe_Systems
Amsteus, M. (2008). Managerial foresight: concept and measurement. Foresight: the Journal of Futures Studies, Strategic Thinking and Policy, 10(1), 53-66. Retrieved November 5, 2010, from Research Library database.
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
Gangeness, J. & Yurkovich, E. (2006). Revisiting case study as a nursing research design. Nurse Researcher, 13(4), 7-18. Retrieved November 5, 2010, from ProQuest Health and Medical Complete database.
Jones, G. R. (2007). Organizational Theory, Design, and Change (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lawrence, P., Lorsch, J. (1967). Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12(1), 1. Retrieved October 24, 2010 from EBSCOHost database
McLeod, P., Lobel, S., & Cox, T. (1996). Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Research, 27, 248-264.
McMillan-Capehart, A. (2006). Heterogeneity or Homogeneity: Socialization Makes the
Difference in Firm Performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19(1), 83-98. Retrieved November 5, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global
Muhaimin, A. G. (2010). The Islamic traditions of Cirebon. Retrieved October 15, 2010 from http://epress.anu.edu.au/islamic/itc/mobile_devices/index.html.
Narayen, S. (2010). Adobe. Adobe Systems Incorporated. Retrieved October 18, 2010 from http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/diversity.
Porter, M.E.. (1985). Technology and competitive advantage. Journal of Business Strategy. 60.
Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Skim and Siegel (2000), Financial management published by Barron’s Educational Series, Inc. (BARON’s BUSINESS LIBRARY Series), ISBN: 0-7641-1402-6.
Richard, O. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 43, 164-177.
Richard, O., & Johnson, N. (2001). A configurationally framework for understanding the impact of human resource diversity practices on firm performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 177-195.
Rowley, J. (2002). Using case studies in research. Management Research News, 25(1), 16-27. Retrieved November 5, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global database.
Watson, W., Kumar, K., & Michaelsen, L. (1993). Cultural diversity 's impact on interaction process and performance: comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 590-602.
Weerd-Nederhof, P. (2001). Qualitative case study research. The case of a PhD research project on organising and managing new product development systems. Management Decision, 39(7), 513-538. Retrieved November 5, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global database.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document