Potential of Actor-Network Theory for Theory Development on IT Project Escalation in Contemporary Organizations

Topics: Actor-network theory, Bruno Latour, Case study Pages: 59 (14592 words) Published: February 15, 2014
The Emerald Research Register for this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/researchregister

ITP
17,2

210

The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0959-3845.htm

Trojan actor-networks and swift
translation
Bringing actor-network theory to IT project
escalation studies
¨
Magnus Mahring
Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden and J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

¨
Jonny Holmstrom
˚
˚
Umea University, Umea, Sweden

Mark Keil
J. Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, and

Ramiro Montealegre
Leeds School of Business, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado, USA and Instituto de Empresa, Madrid, Spain
Keywords Information networks, Case studies, Technology led strategy, Management failures Abstract This study investigates the potential of actor-network theory (ANT) for theory development on information technology project escalation, a pervasive problem in contemporary organizations. In so doing, the study aims to contribute to the current dialogue on the potential of ANT in the information systems field. While escalation theory has been used to study “runaway” IT projects, two distinct limitations suggest a potential of using ANT: First, there is a need for research that builds process theory on escalation of IT projects. Second, the role of technology as an important factor (or actor) in the shaping of escalation has not been examined. This paper examines a well-known case study of an IT project disaster, the computerized baggage handling system at Denver International Airport, using both escalation theory and ANT. A theory-comparative analysis then shows how each analysis contributes differently to our knowledge about dysfunctional IT projects and how the differences between the analyses mirror characteristics of the two theories. ANT is found to offer a fruitful theoretical addition to escalation research and several conceptual extensions of ANT in the context of IT project escalation are proposed: embedded actor-networks, host actor-networks, swift translation and Trojan actor-networks.

Introduction
Escalation is a phenomenon in which an organization or other acting entity persists in pouring resources into a failing course of action (Staw, 1976). In the field of information systems, the problem of project escalation is an important issue given that escalation in software projects is quite common (Keil et al., 2000), that it is often a precursor of Information Technology & People

Vol. 17 No. 2, 2004
pp. 210-238
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
0959-3845
DOI 10.1108/09593840410542510

The first author would like to thank the CIS Department and the eCommerce Institute at Georgia State University for providing a supportive environment in which to explore the ideas contained in this paper. This research was made possible in part by grants from the Sweden-America ´

Foundation and the Carl Silfven Scholarship Fund.

failure (Ewusi-Mensah and Przasnyski, 1991; Lyytinen and Hirschheim, 1987) and that the frequency and costs of IS development failures are considerable (KPMG, 1995; Johnson, 1995). The problem of IT project escalation remains highly relevant, while the remedies are far from well known (Keil and Robey, 1999, 2001). Notwithstanding their important insights in understanding runaway IT projects, existing escalation studies present two distinct limitations that suggest an opportunity to apply ANT. First, there is a need for research that builds process theory on the escalation of IT projects (Montealegre and Keil, 2000), a shortcoming shared with escalation theory (Ross and Staw, 1993). Second, previous escalation studies have not investigated whether the shaping and role of technology is an important factor, let alone actor, in how escalation occurs (cf. Keil, 1995a; Newman and Sabherwal, 1996;...

References: Akrich, M. (1992), “The description of technical objects”, in Bijker, W.E. and Law, J. (Eds),
Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press,
Akrich, M. and Latour, B. (1992), “A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of
human and non-human assemblies”, in Bijker, W.E
Applegate, L.M. (1999), “BAE automated systems: (A) and (B)”, Harvard Business School
Teaching Note, No
Bouton, J. (1993), “State-of-the-art baggage system for Denver”, Airport Forum, February.
Brockner, J. (1992), “The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: toward
theoretical progress”, Academy of Management Review, Vol
Brockner, J. and Rubin, J.Z. (1985), Entrapment in Escalating Conflicts: A Social Psychological
Analysis, Springer Verlag, New York, NY.
Callon, M. (1985), “The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle”, in
Callon, M., Law, J
Callon, M. (1986), “Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and
the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay”, in Law, J
Callon, M. (1991), “Techno-economic networks and irreversibility”, in Law, J. (Ed.), A Sociology of
Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London, pp
Callon, M. and Latour, B. (1981), “Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure
reality and how sociologists help them to do so”, in Knorr-Cetina, K
Eisenhardt, K. (1989), “Building theories from case study research”, Academy of Management
Review, Vol
Ewusi-Mensah, K. and Przasnyski, Z.H. (1991), “On information systems project abandonment:
an exploratory study of organizational practices”, MIS Quarterly, Vol
Goodman, P.S., Bazerman, M. and Conlon, E. (1980), “Institutionalization of planned
organizational change”, in Staw, B.M
Hansen, A. and Mouritsen, J. (1999), “”Managerial technology and netted networks”,
Organization, Vol
Hanseth, O. and Monteiro, E. (1997), “Inscribing behavior in information infrastructure
standards”, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, Vol
Hanseth, O. and Monteiro, E. (1998), “Changing irreversible networks”, Proceedings of the
6th European Conference on Information Systems, Aix-en-Provence, June 4-6.
Johnson, J. (1995), “Chaos: the dollar drain of IT project failures”, Application Development
Trends, Vol
Keil, M. (1995a), “Pulling the plug: software project management and the problem of project
escalation”, MIS Quarterly, Vol
Keil, M. (1995b), “Escalation of commitment in information systems development: a comparison
of three theories”, Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, pp
Keil, M. and Montealegre, R. (2000), “Cutting your losses: how executives can extricate their
organizations when big projects go awry”, Sloan Management Review, Vol
Keil, M. and Robey, D. (1999), “Turning around troubled software projects: an exploratory study
of the de-escalation of commitment to a failing course of action”, Journal of Management
Keil, M. and Robey, D. (2001), “Blowing the whistle on troubled software projects”,
Communications of the ACM, Vol
Keil, M., Mann, J. and Rai, A. (2000), “Why software projects escalate: an empirical analysis and
test of four theoretical models”, MIS Quarterly, Vol
Keil, M., Mixon, R., Saarinen, T. and Tuunainen, V. (1995), “Understanding runaway information
technology projects: results from an international research program based on escalation
Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D. (1999), “A set of principles for conducting and evaluating
interpretive field studies in information systems”, MIS Quarterly, Vol
KPMG (1995), “Runaway projects – causes and effects”, Software World, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 3-5.
Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society,
Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Latour, B. (1991), “Technology is society made durable”, in Law, J. (Ed.), A Sociology of Monsters:
Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London,
Latour, B. (1992), “Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts”, in
Bijker, W.E
Latour, B. (1996), Aramis or the Love of Technology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Latour, B. (1999), Pandora’s Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies, Harvard University
Press, Cambridge, MA.
Law, J. (Ed.) (1991), A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination,
Routledge, London.
Law, J. (1994), Organizing Modernity, Blackwell, Oxford.
Law, J. and Hassard, J. (Eds) (1999), Actor Network Theory and after, Blackwell, Oxford.
Lee, A.S. (1989), “A scientific methodology for MIS case studies”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 1,
pp
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay on Actor Network Theory
  • Group Theory Project Presentation Essay
  • Theories of Development and Underdevelopment Essay
  • Theories Essay
  • Theories Essay
  • Accounting Theory Group Research Project Essay
  • Organization Theory Essay
  • Organization Theories Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free